Tuesday, March 17, 2015

Healthy Congregations, March 15, 2015


Healthy Congregation Meeting

March 15, 2015

 

 

Pastor Jane opened the meeting by re-stating what are the definitions and differences between a vision statement, mission statement, description, and motto.  Everyone broke into groups to come up with various definitions or beginnings of ideas for the following:

 

Vision – A church welcoming people home, a church welcoming others without pressure, greater outreach to the community

 

Mission – Spread the word of God, demonstrating the love of Christ through our actions and witness

 

Description – A family in Christ, sharing God's love with all

 

Motto – A worshiping, nurturing community

 

Pastor Jane mentioned that two families have spoken with her about joining the church, inferring that we are welcoming people who visit with us. 

 

We were asked to consider why it is that we attend this church.

 

It was mentioned that our church has an advantage of blending the traditional with the modern.

 

Judy T said this is a “thinking person's” church, where we are a teaching church.

 

Pastor Jane agreed to print out the mission statement of the Presbyterian Church.

Healthy Congregations Meeting, March 8, 2015


Notes from Vision meeting 8 March 2015

 

 

Pastor Jane led a review of points of prior agreement:

 

·        We want to stay together as a church family;

·        The window of opportunity for economically feasible sale of building/move to new location is past;

·        We have a desire to grow;

 

It was noted that we did not have the notes from last week’s meeting and Pastor Jane indicated that she will make them available during the week.

 

The group again discussed what would be involved in selling/moving. 

 

Next we explored several question posed by Pastor Jane:

 

What did Christ teach that is vital to our life as a Christian community?  Love and acceptance for all was highlighted as the guiding principle.  Pastor Jane asked, “How do others outside know this.  The consensus was that “they do not.”

 

Was there a time in history when COTC acted out of impatience?  The general reaction was that we take too long, not act too quickly.  One person recalled a “time long ago” when there was a push to buy an organ.

 

What about decisions that have taken too long?  In 1990 a deficit budget was put together instead of looking at the hard issues that would have needed to be addressed to close the $20,000 gap.

 

There was a split in the congregation in 1983 involving factions that on one side believed a change in pastor was needed and on the other that supported the pastor very strongly.  The pastor was removed, the congregation divided into two distinct groups, with one withdrawing and starting a new congregation.  The membership of COTC went from over 800 to about 350 as a result. 

 

The general feeling of the group was that we do not have cliques much anymore. 

 

Several members of the group recalled a history that had been prepared for the church’s 50th anniversary and interest was expressed in locating the material that had been prepared/gathered at that time.  Our history is important.

 

The anomaly of the large gym and relatively small sanctuary was discussed.  Many people recalled the time when there were two services with an “8:30 crowd and an 11:00 crowd.”  The process of combining the two into one was also shared.

 

The presentation of the Visioning Process included the idea that it is beneficial to “go out the door and look around” when discussing the vision and direction for a congregation. 

 

When we do this, what do we see and how do we serve in response?  In the immediate vicinity there are low income and minority families, but there are also many “middle class” areas nearby and we need to consider how to reach both.

 

We talked about the preconception by many that churches are always asking for money and if this might prevent some people from visiting/participating.

 

How do we expand our radius?  Need help in working this out.

 

Two ideas that have already been suggested are (1) having a “homecoming” event to reconnect with past members and encourage involvement of present membership and (2) some kind of revival meeting as an outreach opportunity.

 

The need for better advertising was again raised.  It was suggested that we think about maximizing existing opportunities, such as the rummage sale to share our story with the community.  Signage was again mentioned. 

 

We were asked to think about (1) historical impact of our ministry, (2) define our mission to stay together and (3) What are you willing to do?

 

The vision for COTC must come from the members, not from one person.  Once a need or activity is defined, who will take the lead or help?